4-step plan to reducing profit margin fade in your business
Monday, December 12, 2016
The No. 1 challenge many contractors face is profit shrinkage or profit margin fade. This recurring problem appears when final construction job cost comes in higher than the bid or contract project budget. As a business coach, I see numerous contractor income statements every year. I often hear company owners say that they bid using a 15-percent markup for overhead and 10 percent for profit.
But, after studying their year-end, profit-and-loss statement, many business owners only end up with 20-percent gross profit. I ask them what happened to the other 5 percent. They generally don’t understand why they experienced profit shrinkage.
Causes of Profit Margin Fade
Estimators bids jobs using their standard production crew rates for labor and equipment. Completed jobs often cost more than the bid budgets. Profit margin shrinkage can occur for many reasons, including:- The estimator uses the “blind-man method” of bidding. This occurs when he/she closes his eyes and guesses how many hours the crew will take to complete a task.
- The estimator uses the “mystery method” of bidding. This occurs when he/she uses a standard square foot price to bid work. For example, to build and pour concrete sidewalks, he/she estimates $5.75 per square foot for total labor and material versus calculating the exact production labor, equipment and material required.
- The estimator uses a percentage adder factor to cover required supervision, general conditions, cleanup and mobilization on bids. For example, on a $100,000 job, he/she might add 5 percent to pay for these costs, which may or may not be the right amount to cover all these expenses.
- The estimator misses several items or project components required to complete the scope of work.
- The estimator underestimates the schedule or time required, and the overall project takes longer to build than estimated. In another scenario, the field crews work slower than the time estimated to complete the work, causing job costs to increase.
- Field crews were not very efficient, which can be caused by many factors, including poor supervision, little or no pre-project planning, unanticipated, additional move-ins, lack of proper scheduling and bad weather.
- The crew leaves the job before it is complete to get to another project. They have to come back several times to finish their work and the punch list.
- The estimator uses out-of-date, too low or too optimistic production rates to calculate the total labor or equipment required to complete the work.
- The field foreman was never given the project labor production budget or goals for crew hours. He/she also wasn’t given any updated status reports throughout the project. The foreman wasn’t held accountable to meet the job goals for labor and equipment hours either.
- The estimator didn’t go back after projects were completed to verify that the labor and equipment production bid rates used were accurate versus the final job costs. The bid rates were not adjusted properly to make sure they were right to use for future bids.